Search for: All records

Accurate estimates of biomass burning (BB) emissions are of great importance worldwide due to the impacts of these emissions on human health, ecosystems, air quality, and climate. Atmospheric modeling efforts to represent these impacts require BB emissions as a key input. This paper is presented by the Biomass Burning Uncertainty: Reactions, Emissions and Dynamics (BBURNED) activity of the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry project and largely based on a workshop held in November 2023. The paper reviews 9 of the BB emissions datasets widely used by the atmospheric chemistry community, all of which rely heavily on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite observations of fires scheduled to be discontinued at the end of 2025. In this time of transition away from MODIS to new fire observations, such as those from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) satellite instruments, we summarize the contemporary status of BB emissions estimation and provide recommendations on future developments. Development of global BB emissions datasets depends on vegetation datasets, emission factors, and assumptions of fire persistence and phase, all of which are highly uncertain with high degrees of variability and complexity and are continually evolving areas of research. As a result, BB emissions datasets can have differences on the order of factor 2–3, and no single dataset stands out as the best for all regions, species, and times. We summarize the methodologies and differences between BB emissions datasets. The workshop identified 5 key recommendations for future research directions for estimating BB emissions and quantifying the associated uncertainties: development and uptake of satellite burned area products from VIIRS and other instruments; mapping of fine scale heterogeneity in fuel type and condition; identification of spurious signal detections and information gaps in satellite fire radiative power products; regional modeling studies and comparison against existing datasets; and representation of the diurnal cycle and plume rise in BB emissions. 

Abstract Predicting the evolution of burned area, smoke emissions, and energy release from wildfires is crucial to air quality forecasting and emergency response planning yet has long posed a significant scientific challenge. Here we compare predictions of burned area and fire radiative power from the coupled weather/fire‐spread model WRF‐Fire (Weather and Research Forecasting Tool with fire code), against simpler methods typically used in air quality forecasts. We choose the 2019 Williams Flats Fire as our test case due to a wealth of observations and ignite the fire on different days and under different configurations. Using a novel re‐gridding scheme, we compare WRF‐Fire's heat output to geostationary satellite data at 1‐hr temporal resolution. We also evaluate WRF‐Fire's time‐resolved burned area against high‐resolution imaging from the National Infrared Operations aircraft data. Results indicate that for this study, accounting for containment efforts in WRF‐Fire simulations makes the biggest difference in achieving accurate results for daily burned area predictions. When incorporating novel containment line inputs, fuel density increases, and fuel moisture observations into the model, the error in average daily burned area is 30% lower than persistence forecasting over a 5‐day forecast. Prescribed diurnal cycles and those resolved by WRF‐Fire simulations show a phase offset of at least an hour ahead of observations, likely indicating the need for dynamic fuel moisture schemes. This work shows that with proper configuration and input data, coupled weather/fire‐spread modeling has the potential to improve smoke emission forecasts.